Director & shareholder deadlocks — how to prevent & resolve disputes

Learn the difference between board and shareholder deadlocks and the practical options available to resolve disputes and keep a company moving forward.
Talk to us: 0151 600 3493 | hello@shareholderrights.co.uk | Message our team
3 min read

When those responsible for owning and managing a company can’t agree, the company can effectively become paralysed.
It’s important to identify where the deadlock has arisen as board and shareholder deadlocks affect different decision-making bodies and may require different solutions. The distinction remains important even where the same individuals are both directors and shareholders.
Here, Matthew Cleary explains the distinction and the practical options available.
A deadlock may arise at director level, shareholder level or both.
Directors tend to manage the day-to-day operation of a company. They’re not always shareholders, though in smaller companies they often are. Shareholders tend to be responsible for the wider strategic decisions.
A deadlock occurs at either level when the necessary voting majority required to approve a decision cannot be obtained.
In a 50/50 owner-managed company, the same two individuals are likely to each be a director and shareholder. Moving a disputed issue from the board to a general meeting won’t ordinarily resolve it where the shareholders have equal voting rights and remain divided. The disagreement is simply reproduced at shareholder level.
A shareholder meeting may be relevant only where the shareholders have power to resolve the issue and the necessary majority can be achieved, for example because the voting rights at shareholder level aren’t equal. It’s not, by itself, a solution to a genuine 50/50 deadlock at board level.
The articles and shareholders’ agreement should distinguish between board and shareholder decisions and set out what happens if agreement can’t be reached.
Possible measures include:
The parties should review the articles, shareholders’ agreement and relevant resolutions to identify the blocked decision and the approval required. Depending on the documents, options may include negotiation or mediation, use of an agreed escalation process, appointment or removal of a director where the voting position permits, interim arrangements to preserve essential operations or a negotiated exit.
Court proceedings may be available where the statutory requirements are met. A shareholder may petition the court under section 994 of the Companies Act 2006 where the company’s affairs are being or have been conducted in a manner that is unfairly prejudicial to their interests. However, deadlock alone doesn’t establish unfair prejudice.
In appropriate cases, a shareholder of a deadlocked company may also seek winding up of the company on the just and equitable ground, but this is a discretionary and final remedy. Specialist advice should be obtained before either route is pursued.
Board and shareholder deadlocks are related but distinct. A shareholder meeting won’t ordinarily break a genuine 50/50 deadlock between the same individuals. The best protection is careful drafting that allocates decisions clearly and includes workable escalation and exit provisions. Once deadlock arises, early advice can help to preserve essential operations and identify a viable route to resolution.
As specialists in shareholder and director rights, we can advise on the governing documents, parties’ rights and practical options for resolving a deadlock.
Talk to us by calling 0151 600 3493, emailing hello@shareholderrights.co.uk or completing our contact form.
Loading form...

Learn the difference between board and shareholder deadlocks and the practical options available to resolve disputes and keep a company moving forward.

Breaking down how family disputes unfold, why mediation often unlocks progress and the practical steps that can lead to a clean break.

A guide to shareholders’ rights to access financial information in private limited companies — and the legal limits on what can be disclosed.

Even where a company is profitable, the decision not to declare a dividend isn't necessarily unlawful — but nor is it beyond challenge.

Although it’s now correct to say that there’s no statutory limit that would prevent a shareholder from bringing a claim, that isn’t the end of the story.

Here are five typical shareholder disputes examples to show you how things are typically resolved and understand when you might have a claim.

Is it too late to complain? Find out how limitation works in relation to shareholder disputes and unfair prejudice.

Votes and steps taken based on incorrectly recorded shareholding positions may well still be treated as valid by the courts.

What are the main differences between audited and unaudited accounts? Specialist shareholder rights lawyer Paul Lunt explains.

The Companies Act provides that a criminal offence is committed by directors should they fail to comply with a wide range of their obligations.

Get a brief overview of the register of members, including who determines applications for entry, the legal requirements and rules around keeping the register open for inspection.

What are your rights as a shareholder in a private limited company? It depends how many shares you own — here’s what applies at each level of shareholding.

Find answers to our most frequently asked questions about shareholder rights and disputes from our expert litigation lawyers.